Sunday, October 31, 2010
Saturday, October 30, 2010
Thursday, October 28, 2010
"Consequence" 5...
Taking my work to Panera Bread, finished the siding. while enjoying good coffee.. now to get on with the concrete texture...
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
Tuesday, October 26, 2010
Monday, October 25, 2010
"Consequence" 2...
Sunday, October 24, 2010
Speaking of Growing - "Consequence" - WIP
Tuesday, October 19, 2010
Growing as an Artist...
There, again, has been some talk on other medium forums here and there of the 'need to grow as an artist', usually involving shifting to a different medium, as if, somehow, knowing another medium aids in an artist's growth... yet, that in turn raises the question of what constitutes this 'growth' and WHY?... one can certainly have a gain of knowledge from learning a new medium, but it first ought to be assertioned as to why the chosen medium, and what of this medium one is to hopefully gain in terms of 'growth as an artist' - for mere gaining of another technical skill does not, in and of itself, gain a growth as per being an artist... of course, it is possible the term 'growth' is used in a colloquial manner, in that by utilizing a different, and perhaps more socially accepted medium, one's chances of gaining a livelihood from being an artist is thereby enhanced - shifting to using oils, say, instead of continuing with pen and ink would indeed increase the likelihood of commercial success, so long as one not take in account that there so many more artists utilizing oils and thus much greater competition to getting one's own out before the public to be seen... but, other than a greater possibility of making a living as an artist, is this truly 'growth'?
Sometimes I have the notion that these cries of 'needing growth' actually are cries of frustration, as well as an inability of introspecting to knowing just what it is the artist seeks in being the artist [which, of course, is generally part of the frustration], the frustration being more a lacking of the 'sense of visibility' one gets in having others see and grasp one's works with the same understanding of the world as the artist sought in doing the rendering [assuming, too, the artist consciously so sought]... this brings up the idea of the artist as a 'spiritual visualizer'... even if it were no more than showing a 'sense of life', whether positive or negatively, showing such is making an expression of the artist's inner emotional responding to what is of fundamental importance to that artist - and that constitutes 'in the rough' the artist as a 'spiritual visualizer', even in such mundane visualizations as , say, flowers, where that fundamentality is seen in how lifely it is seen [as opposed to decay], or the colorings used [whether bright or dull, towards purity or muddied, for instance], and /or carried into the more cognitive reflections of metaphorical relations, for instance, where grand landscapes are imbuing potentials and possibilities of greater flourishings to humanity...
Sometimes I have the notion that these cries of 'needing growth' actually are cries of frustration, as well as an inability of introspecting to knowing just what it is the artist seeks in being the artist [which, of course, is generally part of the frustration], the frustration being more a lacking of the 'sense of visibility' one gets in having others see and grasp one's works with the same understanding of the world as the artist sought in doing the rendering [assuming, too, the artist consciously so sought]... this brings up the idea of the artist as a 'spiritual visualizer'... even if it were no more than showing a 'sense of life', whether positive or negatively, showing such is making an expression of the artist's inner emotional responding to what is of fundamental importance to that artist - and that constitutes 'in the rough' the artist as a 'spiritual visualizer', even in such mundane visualizations as , say, flowers, where that fundamentality is seen in how lifely it is seen [as opposed to decay], or the colorings used [whether bright or dull, towards purity or muddied, for instance], and /or carried into the more cognitive reflections of metaphorical relations, for instance, where grand landscapes are imbuing potentials and possibilities of greater flourishings to humanity...
Sunday, October 17, 2010
Carrying on....
Among the many comments and inquiries made during the reception for the gallery exhibit of last week [the reception was Friday evening] was the issue of theming, and relating my ink renderings as paintings of fine art, not as mere sketches or drawings... and it brought to mind this from the first year of this blog, and how it relates to the paradigm shift of drawing [however technically fine it may be] to ink painting [however different the techniques may be in doing the rendering]...
It also carries back to the idea of an artist as a 'spiritual visualizer'...
..............
It was mentioned about 'upgrading' pen and ink rendering to Fine Art... what would this mean, and why be wanting to do this? the issue has to do with theming, something which most artists are only dimly aware of, and rarely ever having had any understanding of its nature, let alone of its importance... in visualizing the universe, the world around oneself and/or especially the world within the four corners of the canvas [whether actual canvas or not, but a convenient metaphor for the support on which the rendering is done], there is, for the artist, a necessity, whether consciously seen or not, to sift and choose among all the possibilities, what is considered by the artist of primary IMPORTANCE - indeed, within that universe of creation, by the nature of this choosing, everything which is deemed of importance enough to include is as such metaphysical in importance, precisely because in the choosing, whatever is included assumes fundamental values to the artist... why? as I see it, it is because in creating a work of art, especially Fine Art, an artist is involved in 'selective re-presentation', of necessity - because not everything CAN be included, thus what is, HAS to assume prime importance, whether consciously considered or not... further, the more an artist consciously is aware of this process, the more an artist deliberately strives to arrange and compose according to this premise - the more consistent the end result will be, and the greater the work will be in consequence...
This is, actually, a logical extension to the illustrating [which, of course, also dealt with theming, but from the standpoint of the story and not the rendering itself]... here, tho, it is raised to the work itself, for the work itself, so that one can contemplate the work and grasp that there are layers to it [like the proverbial onion], which in essence is what elevates it beyond mere fancy sketching, or even crafted drawing, to Fine Art - just as is the same with the better works in other mediums...
FURTHER -
It also carries back to the idea of an artist as a 'spiritual visualizer'...
..............
It was mentioned about 'upgrading' pen and ink rendering to Fine Art... what would this mean, and why be wanting to do this? the issue has to do with theming, something which most artists are only dimly aware of, and rarely ever having had any understanding of its nature, let alone of its importance... in visualizing the universe, the world around oneself and/or especially the world within the four corners of the canvas [whether actual canvas or not, but a convenient metaphor for the support on which the rendering is done], there is, for the artist, a necessity, whether consciously seen or not, to sift and choose among all the possibilities, what is considered by the artist of primary IMPORTANCE - indeed, within that universe of creation, by the nature of this choosing, everything which is deemed of importance enough to include is as such metaphysical in importance, precisely because in the choosing, whatever is included assumes fundamental values to the artist... why? as I see it, it is because in creating a work of art, especially Fine Art, an artist is involved in 'selective re-presentation', of necessity - because not everything CAN be included, thus what is, HAS to assume prime importance, whether consciously considered or not... further, the more an artist consciously is aware of this process, the more an artist deliberately strives to arrange and compose according to this premise - the more consistent the end result will be, and the greater the work will be in consequence...
This is, actually, a logical extension to the illustrating [which, of course, also dealt with theming, but from the standpoint of the story and not the rendering itself]... here, tho, it is raised to the work itself, for the work itself, so that one can contemplate the work and grasp that there are layers to it [like the proverbial onion], which in essence is what elevates it beyond mere fancy sketching, or even crafted drawing, to Fine Art - just as is the same with the better works in other mediums...
FURTHER -
In showing, thru his/her renderings, what is considered of prime importance to consider by others in this contemplative measure, this means that even in doing scenes, there needs be more thought to placement of the objects within - their relative sizes, detail emphasis, and so on, so as to better being out the showing of the artist's intent... after all, an artist, a painter, like a writer, is communicating with others, the showing, the visualizing - it is the means of communicating, and if it is unintelligible, then there is a failure to communicate [and if there is a claim of not wanting per se to be communicating, then there is no sense in there being a showing]...
For pen and ink artists, this almost comes with the territory, so to speak, because of the conscious attrition of the unforgiving ink, requiring forethought before depositing, and thus forethought on where and in what manner is to be depicted what is to be deposited by the ink... this, in turn, fosters the creativity, which is an offshoot of this fore-thinking in composing... even in such renderings as portraits, both human and of animals and or/ objects like vehicles or buildings, how these are depicted owes much to the creative thinking, even if heavily taken from photographic references - which, for one, is why they are superior to photographs, for all the attempts of configuring character to the photographic images themselves... for many if not most, all this is more or less intuitive - but the more one is conscious of this and deliberately composes the rendering to this, the better the work and the more a pen and ink artist can claim to be doing Fine Art...
Saturday, October 16, 2010
Recapping an idea...
Spirituality pertains to the mindfulness of a person, the non-material aspect of reality that DIRECTS the usage of the material - NOT, as so often presumed, opposes the material... there has always been a despairing of the attainment of goods, yet the plentitude of the goods and their variety enriches our lives - so it seems only fair to utilize the 'this earth' attitude to justify the 'good life' and mark the accumulation NOT as being frivolous, but as having real depth to the wellbeing of the living... one could say it makes for the practical application of the ethics of viable values... it falls in line with Rand's assertion of aesthetics being 'the technology of the soul'... while she used the word 'Art', I in turn (since she equated aesthetics with art) use the broader term, because I consider the utilitarian aspects as much 'technology of the soul' as the contemplative aspects... spiritual needs involve 'meaning in life'... this covers both short term purposes as well as long term... as much of importance, it pertains to the real world, NOT the fantasy of some 'other world', or of the notion of the 'supernatural', which claims an incompetency of humans, that they are incapable of knowing on their own,and thus must remain perpetually as overaged dependents - children - instead of the self-responsible independent adult... from a psychological standpoint, spirituality means operating at a high level of consciousness - engaging in self-awareness and self-examinations, integrating the issues of values and life... it is considering how one experiences existence - not thru the delusion of faith and negation of the mindfulness - but thru consciousness committed to its own growth, cultivating the ability to see reality in all its manifestations, and as such remaining truthful to 'that which is', emphasizing the difference between believing and knowing... this means reliance on the mind - which involves the issues of independence, self-responsibility, the contrasting of meekness and self-assertions... this, in turn, involves the courage to treat oneself and one's convictions with respect... the end result is living purposefully - creating one's own meaning of and to life, and being a participant as opposed to being an observer... it also raises the issue of integrity, which involves the issue not of how perfect we are in integrity but how concerned we are in correcting breaches...
Friday, October 15, 2010
Spiritual Visualizing Awareness...
One of the most inspiring aspects of being an artist is one in which most artists are at best only dimly aware of - being a 'spiritual visualizer'... there is, to many, an impulse of having to render, but beyond the seeing in terms of compositions of arrangements that are pleasing to the eye, whether as still life or more likely as landscape, there is often little more that comes consciously to mind... it is an awareness that is not informed, and comes in general only to those few who are willing to engage in introspection - not only in terms of the composing via visual, but in terms of answering the 'why' of doing the rendering in the first place...
Too often, tho, this turns to propaganda as the means of justifying some deliberate meaning applied to whatever rendering is under consideration - as if there was little to other meanings which can be gendered to a work, to say nothing of the nature of seeking to do the work itself, why it has interest to the artist, why in that construction, or coloration, or size even... this is where being aware of the artist as a 'spiritual visualizer' comes in - it provides the grounding on which a better understanding of what one as an artist seeks to do as an artist and why [for without the why, without going beyond ascribing the being as mere 'impulse' [as if, in effect, an artist is a mere animal more glorified], there is no real understanding which is needed for improvements and directions worth taking] ...
A work of art, of 'fine art' in that its primary purpose is one of contemplation, is a selective re-presentation of reality [that is, of emphasized graspings of the world around the artist] according to what the artist considers as of fundamental importance [fundamental in that there is of necessity to inclusion AND exclusion of what is to be in the rendering]... it is, as such, a showing of what, out of all the myriad sights and connections of diverse objects and subjects, the artist considers worth seeing... the base on which comes to pass is what the artist considers of value - and that depends on the code of values that artist ascribes to [and rest assured, different values make for much different consequences in what one does and how one does it - and why]... a code of values is what one uses to guide oneself thru life - it is what provides the 'spiritual', the non-material, to living, which gives that material its importance, and WHICH material gets to be important, and why - and, to the artist, the reason of showing that which the artist shows, AND WHY, PROPERLY, AN ARTIST IS A 'SPIRITUAL VISUALIZER'...
Too often, tho, this turns to propaganda as the means of justifying some deliberate meaning applied to whatever rendering is under consideration - as if there was little to other meanings which can be gendered to a work, to say nothing of the nature of seeking to do the work itself, why it has interest to the artist, why in that construction, or coloration, or size even... this is where being aware of the artist as a 'spiritual visualizer' comes in - it provides the grounding on which a better understanding of what one as an artist seeks to do as an artist and why [for without the why, without going beyond ascribing the being as mere 'impulse' [as if, in effect, an artist is a mere animal more glorified], there is no real understanding which is needed for improvements and directions worth taking] ...
A work of art, of 'fine art' in that its primary purpose is one of contemplation, is a selective re-presentation of reality [that is, of emphasized graspings of the world around the artist] according to what the artist considers as of fundamental importance [fundamental in that there is of necessity to inclusion AND exclusion of what is to be in the rendering]... it is, as such, a showing of what, out of all the myriad sights and connections of diverse objects and subjects, the artist considers worth seeing... the base on which comes to pass is what the artist considers of value - and that depends on the code of values that artist ascribes to [and rest assured, different values make for much different consequences in what one does and how one does it - and why]... a code of values is what one uses to guide oneself thru life - it is what provides the 'spiritual', the non-material, to living, which gives that material its importance, and WHICH material gets to be important, and why - and, to the artist, the reason of showing that which the artist shows, AND WHY, PROPERLY, AN ARTIST IS A 'SPIRITUAL VISUALIZER'...
Saturday, October 9, 2010
Exhibiting...
One of the joys in rendering in pen and ink, in some ways more so than with other mediums, is that of seeing works being exhibited as the ink paintings they truly are... these two, "Opening Ritual, Second Cup" and "Clear in the Air", are now, for a week, being exhibited in the Scarfone/Hartley Gallery at the University of Tampa... one may hope their presence will increase interest in pen and ink as a fine art medium...
Sunday, October 3, 2010
"Fertile Worlds".....58
It is not easy working on this, when close to the end - there is the strong desire to be DONE with it, and the urge to 'rush' is in consequence... but, of course, restraint is most needed here, in getting the breaking up of the sky - and it not help, oddly, in that can only work the hand for periods of maybe 15-20 minutes before needing to take a break... thus, while maybe only a couple or so more hours are needed to finish, it is actually taking much longer... it also not help that the interest in this, thru all the long times of many interruptions, has flagged on this, such it takes effort to get back to it... but it moves on...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)